Musescore app3/26/2023 ![]() ![]() I wasn't the one claiming the code is not entirely covered by the CLA the burden of proof isn't mine to bear. So yes, in my experience the first time I contributed I had to sign the CLA or be rejected it is thus (from experience) a decent assumption that all other contributors have undergone a similar process. You are again sidestepping the actual argument I had and are deflecting it to my personal experience. However, your argument is only based on your personal experience, no close to the fact either. I apologize for my proofless claim about the CLA. Yes, you can back up your claim by finding someone that hasn't signed it and whose code is still actively in use, but it seems a far less automatable job and more labour intensive one than comparing the git blame author list with the CLA. No need to go into contacting everyone personally (but knock yourself out if you so choose). You have git blame and the CLA available. "god exists argument" means you can't prove all have signed CLA, but I can't effectively show if there is only and only one case who left out the CLA.īut you can. ![]() Why not just run a git blame on the current sources (as you were advised)? Way less work and actually gives you to overview of everyone that contributed to the current state of the code. However, there is a chance that people left out CLA are in the group of unknown addresses or refused to answer. If any of them (especially who contributed before 2019) answers no, then yours is absolutely a pointless false claim. Then, I've collected all users who has PR accepted through Īnd asked them (if I can find their email address) whether they signed the CLA. Search the code where those strings locate at using Read206: readScore(): part cannot have parts ?checkScore: remove empty ChordRest segment Score::readAddConnector is called not in paste mode. Score::pasteStaff: encountered when no tuplet was started ScoreFont: open glyph metadata file failed Score::readCompressedToBuffer: cannot read zip file Score to append has %d parts and %d staves, but this score only has %d parts and %d staves. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |